Model Litigant 1

The Building Commission are not Model Litigants, they are prosecutors.

The BC conduct the interviews.

The BC write the witness statements.

The BC write the confessions.

The BC write the Affidavits for presentation at the SAT.

They  are the authors of all the evidence for the prosecution.

All the BC’s witness has to do is sign and date everything.

Model Litigant Rules

Model Litigant Rules

Model litigant rules (obligations) are guidelines for how a government ought to behave before, during, and after litigation with another government body, a private company, or an individual.

It is vital that government bodies should not be ‘out to get’ people, but should be acting in the public interest, according to law. These guidelines seek to address an inherent and substantial power imbalance.

The guidelines are integral to the rule of law where a substantial imbalance of power in litigation with government agency may occur. Government bodies may have access to substantial resources, powers to investigate.

Click here for more ***************

Governments at a State and Federal level across Australia have produced a range of guidelines known as model litigant rules. At their heart, these guidelines focus on:

Acting honestly, consistently, and fairly in the handling of claims and litigation;

Dealing with claims promptly;

Making an early assessment of the government’s prospects of success;

Not taking advantage of a claimant who lacks resources;

Not relying on a merely technical defence against a claim.

Employing police to investigate building matters and issue Building Remedy Orders will fail and be referred to the SAT because a lack of expertise. An ex-Builder would identify a problem early and find a resolution acceptable to both parties. The traditional Police Frame up works with known criminals but is hardly the MO for dealing with parties assisting with their enquiry. These fact finding exercises are not a crime investigation so shouldn’t be treated as such. Where will it end? Builders attending interviews with a solicitor!

The Geneva convention of 1929 requires only your name rank and serial number.

Obtaining a convivtion at the SAT knowing it to be wrong is perverting the course of justice and shows contempt of due process.

The WA Police Department are hardly likely to give up their best officers.

If you feel that you haven’t been treated fairly as the Constitution intended give us a call.

CIBC ensuring the Building Commission and the SAT adhere to the Australian Constitution. It’s what Australians fought two world wars for.

Peace, Democracy and Freedom so don’t let anyone take that away from you.

The SAT members are usually born within the bastions of privaledge so the concept of someone not carrying a ladder (based on the evidence of the expert from the BC who has no experience of the job) could lead to a life of crime seems reasonable. (the naivety of a child)

A normal person would find it absurd,

READ ON click here ➔

Model Litigant 2